Unilever Case Study · AutoO2 · Sustainability

AutoO2 by ProvisionAi

Rising fuel. Driver shortage. Unilever achieved 98% utilization — and lower costs and emissions at the same time.

"Even a well-run company like Unilever sees opportunity."
Giovanni Dal Bon · Head of Logistics, North America, Unilever · CSCMP Edge 2021
98%Truck utilization
UndisclosedCost reduction
2039Net-zero supported
Unilever — AutoO2 truckload optimization for sustainability and freight cost reduction
Scope 3 reductionEvery truck eliminated counts
The challenge

Even a well-run company like Unilever sees opportunity.

Trucks at 90–95% utilization left a compounding cost gap across hundreds of daily shipments — extra trucks, extra miles, extra emissions every day.
Rising fuel costs and a global driver shortage made every underloaded truck increasingly expensive to absorb.
As a result, a hard net-zero commitment meant every avoidable truck was both a cost problem and a sustainability failure.

Persistent utilization gap

Trucks at 90–95% left a compounding cost and emissions gap across hundreds of daily shipments.

Rising fuel and carrier costs

External cost pressures made underloaded trucks increasingly expensive to absorb.

Global driver shortage

Every unnecessary shipment consumed scarce carrier capacity that preferred carriers needed elsewhere.

Hard emissions targets

A net-zero commitment meant every avoidable truck was both a cost and a sustainability failure.

The solution

AutoO2: this Unilever case study's fix for closing the utilization gap.

Simultaneously optimizes weight, cube, axle distribution, damage risk, and stacking — on every shipment, every shift.
Utilization pushed to 98% — fewer trucks needed to move the same volume, cutting both cost and CO₂.
In other words, efficiency and sustainability are the same gain — every tightly packed load is one fewer truck on the road.
PlanningERPWMS
AutoO2 truckload optimization — 98% utilization for Unilever sustainability
The insight

Efficiency and sustainability are not in conflict. Maximizing payload per truck is simultaneously the lowest-cost and lowest-emission way to move the same volume of product.

01 — Data ingestion

Shipment data pulled from planning and ERP

Every item's dimensions, weight, stacking constraints, and customer requirements ingested before building a single load plan.

PlanningERPItem master
02 — Simultaneous optimization

Weight, cube, axle, damage — all solved in a single pass

Maximum legal payload on every shipment — no reloads, no violations, no trade-offs between cube and axle compliance.

Global optimumAxle-legalDamage-free
03 — Visual guidance to warehouse floor

Step-by-step visual instructions on screen

Removes expertise dependency — every loader builds the optimized load correctly, every shift, every day.

Visual guidanceZero expertise required
04 — Fewer trucks, same performance

Higher payload = fewer total shipments

Fewer miles driven, less fuel burned, less CO₂ emitted — efficiency gains and Scope 3 sustainability gains are identical.

Scope 3 reductionNet-zero roadmapCost savings
The results

This Unilever case study's numbers: industry-leading utilization, lower costs, lower emissions.

Specifically, these are measured outcomes presented publicly at CSCMP Edge 2021 — not projections.

98% Truck utilization Up from 90–95% baseline
Millions In freight savings Fewer trucks, same volume
2039 Net-zero supported Every truck eliminated counts
"Even a well-run company like Unilever sees opportunity."
Giovanni Dal Bon · Head of Logistics, North America, Unilever · CSCMP Edge 2021

What's the utilization gap costing your network?

Close the gap.
Hit the P&L and the emissions target.

This Unilever case study shows what's possible. Most clients see ROI within 90 days — our team will show you exactly where your loads are leaving money, and carbon, on the table.