Maersk makes an investment in optimization. He invests millions of dollars in a company developing optimization software to manage drayage at ports better.
We all know the problems:
These problems stem from the inefficient matching of containers with dray operators. For example, a truck gets assigned a container at the bottom of a stack rather than a similarly suitable container at the top. LoadSmart claims to match carriers with containers based on various factors = faster turns, fewer touches, and less congestion.
It drives a broader question: why aren’t more companies using optimization to get better results? I think the reasons are:
In reality, optimization in logistics is becoming a “must-have” because most problems are complex to solve. Depending on the cargo, the level of automatization, and many other factors, load building (also called load planning) optimization software AutoO2 saves up to 10% of the transportation costs.
Moreover, the steady growth of diesel, labor, and other transportation expenses and truck driver and equipment shortages make optimizing software more profitable daily.
Additionally, load-building optimization software cuts the number of trucks needed, reducing the company’s carbon footprint and producing waste.
Investment in optimization is profitable; one of our customers claims that their monthly economy from integrating AutoO2 with their systems from one warehouse is $300,000, so quick ROI is guaranteed.
Also, the optimization makes the supply chain more green and significantly improves sustainability and E in ESG.